Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Enact on Heavy School Bags of Children

P.P.BABURAJ
Director, People’s Legal Forum and Member, Juvenile Justice Board, Mysore. Cell: 9448576297

Press Statement                                                                                                                              
13 November 2013
Enact on heavy school bags of children
On the occasion of children’s day, the state government has to take a strong step to reduce the burden of school bag of the children. Currently, school children carry heavy load of books every day and thereby suffer from various ailments such as backache, fatigue, headache, etc. The school authorities or department of education do not give attention on the mental and physical problems of children, arising out of heavy school bags. Every parent is worried of his child’s heavy school bag.

Heavy school bag amounts to cruelty on children. ‘Learning without burden’, though accepted in principle, has still remained in the National Curriculum Framework of 2005. Children have been deprived of playful and joyous curriculum. It is high time for the government to enact law limiting the weight of school bags at 10% of the body weight of the child. The government under the leadership of Sri Siddaramaiah should show the will to immediately address this problem of children of our land, on this occasion. This would add meaning in celebration of children’s day.

Warm regards


P.P. Baburaj

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Letter to Chief Minister of Kerala to give attention to the indefinite fast undertaken by Sri. A Mohankumar and others at Kasargod for Endosulfan victims


To                                                                                             12th March 2013
Mr Oommen Chandy
Chief Minister of Kerala
Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala.

Dear Chief Minister,

Sub: Seeking immediate attention to the indefinite fast by Endosulfan victims at Kasargod –reg.

The indefinite fast taken up the victims of Endosulfan is a shame for a Government led by a Congress man whose roots are found in Gandhian ideology. Gandhi, if alive would have run to the tiny tent at Kasargod and sit with the victims who are on fast for the past 21 days. However, your government stands different in neglecting this indefinite fast by poor victims. All of us know that they are not powerful, influential or strong enough to shake the government. Satyagraha, a mode of struggle given by Gandhi is the only strategy they can resort to, to draw your attention. However, your continued silence to their Satyagraha till now is cruel violence on the victims. Victimisation of the victims is an unmatchable violence by a government in the recent history.  Wearing Khadi and speaking of Gandhian principles, why do you need to run a government unless you are able to take care of the pain, anguish and concern of the wretched, suppressed and vulnerable?
Kasargod needs urgently your presence to give them solace; a budgetary provision for their effective rehabilitation; a strong message from you for the non-violent development model.
Looking forward to your immediate intervention and make us proud of Kerala.
Thanking you,
Warm regards

Adv. P.P. Baburaj
Mysore.

Letter to Chief Justice of India regarding porno materials in internet



To                                                                                                                    8th March 2013

Hon’ble Justice Altamas Kabir,
Chief Justice of India
Supreme Court of India
New Delhi.

Respected Sir,

Sub: Pornographic contents of young girls in internet – reg

In the midst of cries and demands for justice for the victims of sexual violence in the country, I would like to bring into your kind notice that porn photographs and videos of girls as young as 13 years are readily available in the web. After a point raised in the discussion on child abuse held in Bangalore in a workshop on girl children last week, I browsed Google and typed ‘teen sex’ and to my shock, the sites having porn videos and photographs of girl children opened. The most disgusting and dangerous aspect is Google has shown pictures of old men having sex with girls as young as 12 -14 years. Every picture has ‘catchy’ caption too!

Such porn photos and videos are available on a click for anyone. As a father of a girl child and a child rights activist, I am afraid of the consequences of access to such materials in internet for anyone. The clippings in the internet would create an impression among the viewers that young children also could be sexually used. The objectionable materials, not only do have nude portrayals but tempting explanations as well. This could, consciously or unconsciously, lead many of the internet savvy adults and youngsters into crime against young girl children. The incessant reports of sexual crimes against girl children indicate that it has linkage with such materials. Why does the society need such materials after all?

When there are countries which have completely banished such materials in internet, why can’t India where violence agaisnt women and girl children is on increase? I think all such materials on children have to be removed from the web world. I earnestly pray for strict guidelines from the apex court to the internet service providers in India to do away with all porno materials on children. I feel it would be appropriate if this is adhered to while framing the Rules of the latest Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012.

Looking forward to your kind and judicious decision in this regard,

With anguish and concern,


P.P.BABURAJ
Director, People’s Legal Forum.    

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Juvenile in Delhi Rape case


¨Á¯ÁgÉÆÃ¦UÉ ²PÉë K£ÀÄ?
¦.¦.¨Á§ÄgÁeï, ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ

¢°èAiÀÄ°è ¥ÁågÁ ªÉÄrPÀ¯ï «zÁåy𤠪ÉÄÃ¯É £ÀqÉzÀ WÀl£É £ÀªÀÄä £ÁUÀjPÀ ¸ÀªÀiÁdPÉÌ §ºÀÄzÉÆqÀØ ¸ÀªÁ¯ÁV ¥Àjt«Ä¹zÉ. CªÀiÁ£À«ÃAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CwPÀÆægÀªÁzÀ F WÀl£É ¸ÀªÀðgÀ°è DPÉÆæÃ±À J©â¹zÉ. DPÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÀqÉzÀ ºÀ¯ÉèAiÀİè M§â ¨Á®PÀ EzÀÝ J£ÀÄߪÀÅzÀÄ ºÉZÀÄÑ ZÀZÉðUÉ UÁæ¸ÀªÁVzÉ. CzÀÆ C®èzÉ, DvÀ£Éà DPÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉZÀÄÑ PËæAiÀÄð vÉÆÃjzÀ J£ÀÄߪÀÅzÀÄ J®ègÀ°è PÉÆÃ¥À Kj¹zÉ.

§ºÀıÀ: CzÀgÀ PËæAiÀÄð¢AzÁV ¸ÀzÀj WÀl£ÉUÉ ºÉZÀÄÑ UÀªÀÄ£À ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁ¬ÄvÀÄ. FUÀ zÉñÀzɯÉèqÉ CvÁåZÁgÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ PÀÆUÀÄ K¼ÀÄwÛzÉ. F zËdð£ÀåPÉÌ PÀrªÁt ºÁPÀ¯ÉèÉÃPÉAzÀÄ AiÀÄĪÀd£ÀvÉAiÀÄÆ gɸÉÛV½¢zÁÝgÉ. J®ègÀ ¨ÉÃrPÉUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄÄRåªÁzÀzÀÄÝ CvÁåZÁjUÉ CwPÀpt ²PÉë PÉÆr J£ÀÄߪÀÅzÀÄ. UÀ®Äè²PÉë¬ÄAzÀ »rzÀÄ PÁªÀÄ ºÀgÀt ZÀÄZÀĪÀÄzÀÄÝ vÀ£ÀPÀ ¸À®ºÉUÀ¼À°è EªÉ. ¢°è ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ 6£Éà DgÉÆÃ¦ 18 ªÀµÀðPÉÌ M¼À¥ÀlÖªÀ£ÀÄ. FvÀ¤UÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà jAiÀiÁ¬Äw PÉÆqÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ JAzÀÆ ¨ÉÃrPÉUÀ½ªÉ. DgÉÆ¦UÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄUÉ ©lÄÖPÉÆr, «ZÁgÀuÉ ¨ÉÃqÀ K£ÀÆ ¨ÉÃqÀ, £ÁªÀÅ CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ²Që¸ÀÄvÉÛÃªÉ JAzÀÆ ¨ÉÃrPɬÄnÖzÁÝgÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¨ÉÃrPÉ §UÉÎ ªÀÄÄRå £ÁåAiÀĪÀÄÆwðUÀ¼ÁzÀ C®ÛªÀiÁ¸ï PÀ©Ãgï JZÀÑjPÉAiÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀÄUÀ¼À£ÁßrzÁÝgÉ. GzÉéÃUÀPÉÌ M¼ÀUÁUÀ¨ÉÃr, PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀ¯ÉPɼÀUÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¥ÀæAiÀÄw߸À¨ÉÃr JAzÀÄ CªÀgÀÄ ¸À®ºÉ ¤ÃrzÁÝgÉ.

DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼À°è M§â£ÁzÀ ¨Á®PÀ£À£ÀÄß K£ÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ? DvÀ£À£ÀÄß UÀ°èUÉÃj¸À¨ÉÃPÉ? £ÀªÀÄä zÉñÀzÀ°ègÀĪÀ ¨Á®£ÁåAiÀÄ (¥ÉÆÃµÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÀPÀëuÉ) PÁAiÉÄÝ 2000 ¨Á®PÀgÀ UÀ®Äè ²PÉëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤µÉâü¹zÉ. fêÀ ¥ÀgÀåAvÀ ²PÉëUÀÆ CªÀPÁ±À«gÀĪÀÅ¢®è. CAvÀºÀ DgÉÆÃ¦AiÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÉ ¨Á®£ÁåAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ°è £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄvÀÛzÉ. 18 ªÀAiÀĹì£À ªÉÄîàlÖ DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¨Á®PÀ£À «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqɸÀĪÀAw®è. DzÀÝjAzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥À¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀævÉåÃPÀªÀiÁr ªÀÄAqÀ½ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¸À°è¸ÀĪÀ dªÁ¨ÁÝj ¥ÉưùUÉ EzÉ. ¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è ºÉÆ¸ÀzÁV gÀZÀ£ÉAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀ ªÀÄPÀ̼À «±ÉõÀ ¥Éưøï WÀlPÀPÉÌ ¨Á®PÀ£À£ÀÄß vÀ¤ÃSÁ WÀlPÀzÀ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ºÀ¸ÁÛAvÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. £ÀAvÀgÀ «±ÉõÀ WÀlPÀzÀªÀgÀÄ DvÀ£À£ÀÄß ªÀÄAqÀ½ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÉüÉAiÀİè DvÀ£À£ÀÄß «ÃPÀëuÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è Ej¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. vÀ¥ÀÄà ¸Á©ÃvÁzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¨Á®PÀ£À£ÀÄß PÀ®A 15gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ «±ÉõÀ UÀȺÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà PÁgÀtPÀÆÌ eÉʰUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀĪÀAw®è. «±ÉõÀ UÀȺÀzÀ°è ¨Á®PÀ£À ªÀÄ£À:¥ÀjªÀvÀð£ÉAiÀiÁUÀĪÀAvÀºÀ ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼ÀÄ EgÀÄvÀÛªÉ. £ÀÄjvÀ D¥ÀÛ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀPÀgÀÄ ¤gÀAvÀgÀªÁV D¥ÀÛ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀÄvÁÛgÉ. vÀgÀ¨ÉÃwUÀ¼ÀÄ PÉÆqÀ¯ÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¨Á®PÀ£À PÀÄjvÀ ¥ÀæUÀw ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤AiÀÄ«ÄvÀªÁV ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. 18 ªÀµÀð vÀÄA§ÄªÀ ªÀgÉUÉ DvÀ£À£ÀÄß »ÃUÉ ElÄÖPÉÆ¼ÀÀÄzÀÄ. £ÀAvÀgÀ, DvÀ£À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄgÀĵÀgÀ ¥ÀÄ£ÀªÀð¸Àw PÉÃAzÀæªÉÇAzÀPÉÌ ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸À¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. C°è 3 ªÀµÀð ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ G¸ÀÄÛªÁjAiÀįÉèà ¥ÀÄ£ÀªÀð¸Àw PÁAiÀÄð £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄvÀÛzÉ. E¢µÀÄÖ PÁAiÉÄÝAiÀÄÄ ºÉüÀÄvÀÛzÉ. vÀ¥ÀÄà ªÀiÁrzÀ ¨Á®PÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ JA¢UÀÆ C¥ÀgÁzsÀzÉqÉUÉ ºÉÆÃUÀzÀAvÉ RavÀ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ D±ÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¨Á®£ÁåAiÀÄ PÁAiÉÄÝ ºÉÆA¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.  

DzÀgÉ £ÀªÀÄä£ÀÄß PÁqÀĪÀAvÀºÀ «ZÁgÀ ¨ÉÃgÉAiÉÄà EzÉ. DvÀ KPÉ »ÃUÁzÀ? ¨Á¯ÁgÉÆÃ¦AiÀÄ »£Éß¯É K£ÀÄ? ¢°èAiÀÄ «zÁåy𤠪ÉÄÃ¯É ºÀ¯Éè £ÀqɸÀĪÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß DvÀ J¯Éè°è EzÀÝ? M§â C¥ÀgÁ¢üAiÀÄ »AzÉ JAvÀºÀ ¸ÀªÀĸÉåUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¸ÀªÁ®ÄUÀ¼ÀÄ EªÉ J£ÀÄߪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀÄ MzÀV¸ÀĪÀªÀgÀÄ £ÉÆÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÁVzÉ. DvÀ aPÀÌ ªÀAiÀĹì£À¯Éèà ±Á¯É ©lÖªÀ£ÀÄ. ªÀÄ£É vÉÆgÉzÀªÀ£ÀÄ. ¨Á®PÁ«ÄðPÀ£ÁV ºÀ®ªÀÅ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼ÀÄ zÀÄrzÀªÀ£ÀÄ. JA¢UÀÆ ¦æÃw ªÁvÀì®å C£ÀĨsÀ«¹zÀªÀ£À®è. CªÀ¤UÉ ¹QÌzÀÝ UɼÉAiÀÄgÀÄ C¥ÀgÁzsÀ ªÁ¸À£É EgÀĪÀªÀgÀÄ. DvÀ F ªÀÄlÖPÉÌ ¨É¼É¢zÀÝPÉÌ £ÀªÀÄä ¸ÀªÀiÁdzÀ ¥ÁvÀæ K£ÀÆ E®èªÉÃ? AiÀiÁgÀÆ vÁ£ÉƧâ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï DUÀ¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¤tðAiÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅ¢®è. ¥Àj¸ÀgÀ CzÀ£ÀÄß ¤tð¬Ä¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ. PÁqÀÄUÀ¼Àî «ÃgÀ¥Àà£ï PÀÆqÁ EAvÀºÀÄzÉà »£É߯ɬÄAzÀ §AzÀªÀ£ÀÄ. ªÀÄPÀ̼ÀÄ C¥ÀgÁzsÀzÉqÉUÉ ºÉÆÃUÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉ CzÀgÀ°è ¥ÉÆÃµÀPÀgÀ ¥ÁvÀæ §ºÀ¼ÀµÀÄÖ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¤®ðPÀëöå, ¨ÉÊUÀ¼À, ºÉÆqÉvÀ, §rvÀ, C£ÀUÀvÀå QjQj, MvÀÛqÀ, »ÃAiÀiÁ½¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ, C£ÀUÀvÀå ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt, PËlÄA©PÀ zËdð£Àå, PÀÄrvÀ, §qÀvÀ£À, ±Á¯ÉUÀ¼À C¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ, ²PÀëPÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀºÀ¥ÁpUÀ¼À ¤AzÀ£É... EªÀÅ ªÀÄPÀ̼À ªÉÄÃ¯É zÉÆqÀØ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ°è ¥ÀjuÁªÀÄ ©ÃgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ªÀÄPÀ̼À°è C¸ÀºÀ£É, zÉéõÀ, ¥ÀæwPÁgÀ ¨É¼ÉAiÀÄ®Ä EzÀÄ PÁgÀtªÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀgÀ ¥ÀjuÁªÀĪÁV ªÀÄPÀ̼ÀÄ MAzÉÆÃ ¸ÀéAiÀÄA ¦Ãr¸ÀĪÀ PÀÈvÀåPÉÌ ªÀÄÄAzÁUÀÄvÁÛgÉ E®è¢zÀÝgÉ EvÉgÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÀ¯ÉèUÉ ªÀÄÄAzÁUÀÄvÁÛgÉ. EAvÀºÀ C¥ÀgÁ¢üUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄä ¸ÀªÀiÁdªÉà ºÀÄnÖ¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀÄ ¤gÀAvÀgÀ. F C¥ÀgÁ¢üUÀ¼ÀÄ £ÀªÀÄä «µÀ°¥ÀÛ ¸ÀªÀiÁdzÀ ¥Àæw¤¢üUÀ¼ÉAzÉà ºÉüÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ.

¨Á®£ÁåAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ  ªÀÄÄAzÉ §gÀĪÀ C£ÉÃPÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è PÀ¼ÀîvÀ£À, zÀgÉÆÃqÉ, ºÀ¯Éè, PÉÆ¯É, CvÁåZÁgÀ ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀªÀÅ EªÉ. F ¨Á®PÀgÀ »£Éß¯É £ÉÆÃrzÀgÉ §ºÀÄ¥Á®Ä ªÀÄPÀ̼ÀÆ »AzÀĽzÀ ªÀUÀðPÉÌ ¸ÉÃjzÀªÀgÁVgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ±Á¯É ©lÄÖ PÀư£Á° ªÀiÁr fêÀ£À ¸ÁV¸ÀĪÀªÀgÀÄ C£ÉÃPÀ. §ºÀÄvÉÃPÀjUÉ C¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ vÁ¬Ä ªÀiÁvÀæ EgÀÄvÁÛ¼É. EªÀgÀ ¥Àj¸ÀgÀªÀÅ ªÀÄvÉÛ ªÀÄvÉÛ CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß C¥ÀgÁzsÀzÉqÉUÉ zÀÆqÀĪÀAvÉ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EAvÀºÀ ªÀÄPÀ̼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀjzÁjAiÀÄ°è £ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä £ÀªÀÄä ¸ÀªÀiÁd K£ÀÄ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀß ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÉ?

¢°èAiÀÄ°è £ÀqÉzÀ ¥ÁvÀPÀzÀ°è ¨sÁUÀªÀ»¹zÀ ¨Á®PÀ¤UÉ ªÀiÁ£À¹PÀ aQvÉìAiÀÄ CUÀvÀå«zÉAiÉÄà ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ UÀ®Äè CxÀªÁ fêÀ¥ÀAiÀÄðAvÀ ²PÉë C®è. £ÀªÀÄä ²PÁë jÃwUÀ¼ÀÄ CªÉÊeÁФPÀªÁVzÀÄÝ C¥ÀgÁ¢üUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÛµÀÄÖ zÉÆqÀØ Qæ«Ä£À®ÄUÀ¼ÁV ªÀiÁ¥ÀðlĪÀAvÀºÀ ¸À¤ßªÉñÀUÀ½ªÉ. C¥ÀgÁzsÀ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄvÉÛ ¸ÀªÀiÁdzÀ ªÀÄÄRåªÁ»¤UÉ vÀgÀ®Ä ¸ÀªÀiÁdzÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀߪÀÇ DUÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ. »A¸ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àæ¨sÀÄvÀéªÉà ¥ÀæZÉÆÃ¢¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ¸À®èzÀÄ. »A¸ÁvÀäPÀ ²PÉëAiÀÄ ªÉʨsÀ«ÃPÀgÀt DgÉÆÃUÀåªÀAvÀ ¸ÀªÀiÁdzÀ ±ÀĨsÀ®PÀëtªÀ®è.
(¯ÉÃRPÀgÀÄ ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ ¨Á®£ÁåAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ)

Juvenile vulnerability


Juvenile vulnerability

By P. P. Baburaj*

16 year old Sadiq (name changed) is the youngest among 4 children of Anwar Pasha, a roadside vendor in Sivajinagar of Bangalore city. He was caught by the police on the charges of theft (IPC 379). On hearing the news of his arrest, Pasha and his wife were very much disturbed and frantically approached religious leaders and relatives to bring him out of the case. He was released after 5 days from the Government Observation Home on bail granted by the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). Sadiq also was so much afraid of the whole process after he was caught. He reported torture by the police in the lockup for a day before he was sent to Observation Home. Unable to bear the pain exerted on him by the police, he agreed with whatever they tutored. He was on the spot when the theft took place by a few elders who fled after seeing the police.

Sadiq lives in a one bed room house in a slum of Bangalore city. Except in monsoon, he sleeps with two other brothers outside the house as the house is congested. He studied in Urdu medium till 5th standard and discontinued education only to join his father in vending. However, he wanted to continue in school and left the idea after stiff resistance from parents as he had ‘grown up enough’ to earn for the family.

When he was out of the OH, Pasha insisted him to be with him fulltime in vending. However, his tale of woes unfolded since then. The police came again in search of Sadiq on another charge of theft of home theatre and other electronic equipments from a house in the city. It was a shock to Sadiq as he was not at all involved in any such activities. Pasha closed the shop and ran around to get his son out of OH. Pasha says, “I earn about Rs.300-400 a day. I pay a monthly rent of Rs.1800 for home and a daily rent of Rs.80 for the shop. I lose all the savings when he is caught by the police. Everyone asks money. I am fed up.”

Thus Sadiq was caught thrice by the police on same charges. On each arrest, he was beaten up and forced to confess on the charges framed by the police. Unable to continue with his father’s work, he thought of leaving the city for a living.

There are a good number of juveniles of Sadiq’s age group who are falsely framed under certain criminal charges.  In the research on ‘reasons of juvenile crimes’, commissioned by ECHO-Centre for Juvenile Justice, Bangalore, it was found that the number of such children fabricated under false charges was not small. Some juveniles have revealed that they had committed theft in the first case but the second and third were false. A juvenile who is once caught by the police in an offence has more chances of getting caught repeatedly. In the research, which is in the wrapping stage, it was found that such juveniles hailed from a vulnerable background. They could easily be tracked, bended upon and tutored. Police finds it easy to fall upon such juveniles for their unproven long pending cases. The police officials corroborate such instances. Putting it off the record, police officials repented that some of them had to do it due to pressure to clear the pending cases. The social workers involved in rehabilitation of juveniles in the city vouched that ‘fixing’ of juveniles in theft cases was quite common. They have come across a large number of children repeatedly coming through the juvenile justice process after they were ‘fixed’ in cases by the police. The ‘fixing’ of cases repeatedly on a juvenile gradually makes him a criminal, an unwanted human being and a prodigal. The community including friends and relatives refuse to accept him back to the home circles wholeheartedly even after he is relieved of all cases. He obviously ends up in joining professionals in criminal activities.

Vulnerability is the outstanding factor for a child to get into criminal inclinations. It is definitely not his choice. There are several pushing factors around him to get into a crime. The stakeholders need to see him sympathetically and put efforts to understand his vulnerability before prejudiced against him. Circumstances do play a major role to turn a juvenile a delinquent. The vulnerability coupled with the natural instinct of their deviant behaviour makes them prey for the police. In the research process, we found that most of the juveniles who underwent the procedures have developed arrogance, dissatisfaction, pessimistic overtures, devoid of hope, intolerance with their parents and immature conclusions about life.

In the findings of ECHO research, sponsored by Dept of Women and Child Development and UNICEF, the juveniles were dissatisfied with the administration of justice. They find hardly anyone who touches their heart in the process. All the stakeholders like police, government staffs, court officials etc behave with them rudely and prejudiced. It is now highly relevant to revamp the administration of juvenile justice system in such a way to be more conducive to the aspirations and innocence of juveniles.

*The author is the consultant of the ECHO research